Shannon wrote:
But I don't think you can simply call these policies 'illiberal,' if you take a closer look at the cultural and historical context you're speaking about, including the power structures at play and the fact that this was a decision taken collectively/by consensu, by the communities (and especially advocated for by the women).
cheers for the links, interesting stuffs.
while recognising the sociatal forces at play, i say 'illiberal' because they've gone down the route of prohibition and disadvantaging those not in marriage to get to some kind of positive liberty, rather than the progressive alternative of trying to educate/make aware/enlighten people to the full ramifications of their actions/methods in whatever walk of life, and to form and encourage support networks for both those who enjoy such things (and all aspects of life in general) and to those who need help with a problem. not that their situation might not be better, but i'm not keen on revolutionaries that seem to miss this kinda point.
_________________
hey, if you don't like it, post on the BB (so you can ask about participating for better) |
MilkMiruku